Government failing to act on corruption
The UK Government has failed to modernise and toughen anti-corruption laws. It withdrew its own Corruption Bill and hasn’t backed reforms proposed by Transparency International.
Writing in The Times, lawyer Jeremy Summers criticises the Government’s failures on corruption.
But Britain’s enforcement record, in sharp contrast, remains poor. Already reeling from the decision to halt the BAE Systems al-Yamamah investigation, it recently suffered another setback when the Government was forced to withdraw its Corruption Bill in a state of disarray.
Remarkably, the Government has also refused to support an alternative and far more workable Corruption Bill proposed by the leading international antibribery body, Transparency International (TI). Instead, it has asked the Law Commission to propose alternative legislation, with the effect that any new law is unlikely to be in force until 2009 at the earliest.
The UK’s anticorruption legislation, which has remained largely unchanged since 1916, was essentially formulated to deal with the then principal evil, corruption in public office. But the pace and international nature of commerce has changed dramatically and it is universally accepted that new legislation to tackle modern-day corruption is needed.
The article goes on to tell how the latest attempts to reform the law have stalled, concluding:
Many now argue persuasively that the perception of political interference in the al-Yamamah decision has greatly compromised the Government’s position on corruption.
The full ramifications of that decision remain to be seen, but in the interim the failure to bring in new legislation – even though a respected independent body has provided credible way forward – does the Government little credit.
Posted in law |